Council of Europe Committee Report Denounces Unjustified Swine Flu Scare, Waste of Public Money

Attached is the press release from the Social, Health and Family Affairs Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) outlining the conclusions of the provisional PACE report, The handling of the H1N1 pandemic: more transparency needed. The Press Release  denounces the unjustified Swine Flu scare and waste of public money. Fiona Godlee, Editor-in-Chief of the British Medical Journal,  told the Council that, according to an investigation by her journal, scientists who drew up key WHO guidelines on stockpiling flu vaccines had previously been paid by drug companies which stood to profit.

Meanwhile, here in New Brunswick, Canada, on the same day the Council of Europe report was released questioning the handling of the H1N1 flu our Department of Health announced plans to expand  our seasonal flu vaccination program to cover all children under 18 "after the success of last fall's H1N1 campaign."  The Department of Health Deputy Chief Medical Officer Paul Van Buynter measured success solely by the large numbers of New Brunswickers who received the H1N1 shot.  There is no mention of the many credible voices, in Canada and in Europe who have questioned whether the scare campaign launched in Europe and elsewhere including here in New Brunswick was justified.

Press release - 455(2010)

PACE Health Committee denounces ‘unjustified scare’ of Swine Flu, waste of public money

Strasbourg, 04.06.2010 – The handling of the H1N1 pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO), EU agencies and national governments led to a “waste of large sums of public money, and unjustified scares and fears about the health risks faced by the European public”, according to a report by the Social, Health and Family Affairs Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) made public today in Paris.

The report, prepared by Paul Flynn (United Kingdom, SOC) and approved today by the committee ahead of a plenary debate at the end of this month, says there was “overwhelming evidence that the seriousness of the pandemic was vastly overrated by WHO”, resulting in a distortion of public health priorities.

Presenting his report, Mr Flynn told the committee: “this was a pandemic that never really was”, and described the vaccination programme as “placebo medicine on a large scale” (see video below).

In its adopted text, the committee identifies what it calls “grave shortcomings” in the transparency of decision-making about the outbreak, generating concerns about the influence of the pharmaceutical industry on decisions taken. Plummeting confidence in such advice could prove “disastrous” in the case of a severe future pandemic, it warns.

In particular, the WHO and European health institutions were not willing to publish the names and declarations of interest of the members of the WHO Emergency Committee and relevant European advisory bodies directly involved in recommendations concerning the pandemic, the parliamentarians point out.

However, attending the meeting was Fiona Godlee, the Editor-in-Chief of the British Medical Journal, who told the parliamentarians that, according to an investigation by her journal, scientists who drew up key WHO guidelines on stockpiling flu vaccines had previously been paid by drug companies which stood to profit.

The WHO has been “highly defensive”, the committee said, and unwilling to accept that a change in the definition of a pandemic was made, or to revise its prognosis of the Swine Flu outbreak.

The committee sets out a series of urgent recommendations for greater transparency and better governance in public health, as well as safeguards against what it calls “undue influence by vested interests”. It also calls for a public fund to support independent research, trials and expert advice, possibly financed by an obligatory contribution of the pharmaceutical industry, as well as closer collaboration with the media to avoid “sensationalism and scaremongering in the public health domain”.

The report is due to be debated by parliamentarians from all 47 Council of Europe member states on Thursday 24 June during PACE’s summer session in Strasbourg.

Contacts

In Paris: Francesc Ferrer, mobile: +33 (0)6 30 49 68 22

In Strasbourg: PACE Communication Division, tel. +33 (0)3 88 41 31 93, mobile: +33 (0)6 30 49 68 20

Pandemic or Profit and Panic? WHO Scientist Claims Swine Flu Pandemic Was Completely Exaggerated

Inforwars (see also the Daily Mail) reports that a WHO scientist, Professor Ulrich Keil, director of the WHO’s Collaborating Centre for Epidemiology,     has testified  during hearings at Strasbourg France of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, a body comprised of democratically elected representatives of 47 nations, that the Swine flu pandemic was completely exaggerated:

“With SARS, with avian flu, always the predictions are wrong…Why don’t we learn from history? It [swine flu] produced a lot of turmoil in the pubic and was  completely exaggerated in contrast with all the really important matters we have to deal with in public health. We know the great killers are hypertension, smoking, high cholesterol, high body mass index, physical inactivity and low fruit and vegetable intake.  In spite of all these facts, governments instead wasted huge amounts of money by investing in pandemic scenarios whose evidence base is weak.”

PACE is holding hearings pursuant to a motion by the former chair of the PACE Health Committee, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former German lawmaker,  medical doctor and epidemiologist and will try to determine whether the Swine Ful, H1N1 pandemic was a false pandemic declared on the advice of medical advisors with close financial ties to the pharmaceutical companies that benefited from the production of the H1N1 vaccines.  The investigation will also look at why two shots were initially advised when one was later found to be sufficient, the haste at which the vaccines were developed and the use of adjuvants in the vaccines.

As reported by Infowars  Dr. Wodarg has been very critical of WHO actions in declaring the Swine Flu out break a pandemic noting that the definition of pandemic was changed and softened and that the pandemic was declared with very little evidence to support the declaration:

“It was stated in panic- stricken terms that this was a flu that could threaten humanity and a great number of humans could fall ill. This is why billions of dollars of medications were bought.” Wodarg said.

He added that the the change in definition “made it possible for the pharmaceutical industry to transform this opportunity into cash, under contracts which were mainly secret.”

“In my view, the WHO undertook an incomprehensible action, which cannot be justified by scientific evidence. The Council of Europe should investigate this to see how WHO can undertake this kind of dangerous nonsense,” said Dr Wodarg.

Infowars also reports that  WHO’s flu chief, Dr Fukuda, insists WHO's swine flu scientists were not improperly influenced by ties to  pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Fukuda  criticizes those who call the pandemic a fake:

“Let me state clearly for the record – the influenza pandemic policies and responses recommended and taken by WHO were not improperly influenced by the pharmaceutical industry.” Fukuda told the inquiry.

He said those calling the epidemic fake were wrong and irresponsible."

Personally,  I did wonder from the outset whether the pandemic label and the panic were justified.  But I am just an ordinary citizen and far from being  an expert on epidemic outbreaks.  There have been actual experts, even public health authorities, other than Dr. Wodarg, who have questioned all along whether the pandemic label and the panic generated by public health authorities pushing everyone to get the H1N1 vaccine was appropriate and necessary.

The PACE investigation is important for addressing issues fundamental to public health  around the globe.  Decisions made to invest in and promote vaccine ingredients will always have huge impacts on our health. The PACE investigation is examining whether resources that might have been spent elsewhere were diverted as a result of a false panic generated by profit motives and undue influence.  What they learn will be important for our future health decisions.  

The Swine Flu pandemic also raises issues fundamental to democracy.  The role of powerful, profit driven organizations in influencing public health decisions and allocating resources is critical.  The role of public health authorities in promoting panic based on weak evidence and demonizing citizens as irresponsible for questioning their decisions are important concerns to be examined by responsible bodies of deliberation. These are important issues for the health of citizens and for the health of democracies that purportedly value fee expression and government of the people, by the people, for the people. 

Videos and Transcripts of the statements by Professor Keil, Dr. Wodarg, Dr. Fukuda and Dr. Luc Hessel of the Europeoa Vaccine Manufacturers, along with their biographies are available on the PACE web site.

autism

Was the H1N1 a Fake Pandemic? A Council of Europe Motion to Investigate Drug Sellers Influence

In WHO to Clarify H1N1 Data After False Pandemic Claim Bloomberg  reports that "The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe plans to debate the theme “Faked pandemics: a threat to health” at a plenary session in Strasbourg, France" next week.  

Not to quibble too much with "B"but the debate is not just debate of a theme in an academic or abstract sense.  It is  debate on an actual motion which calls on the member states of the Council of Europe to conduct investigation of the influence of "drug makers" in defining and declaring pandemics.

I am not, and do not pretend to be, prescient.  I do not know what the outcome of the debate will be.  Given the emphasis placed by governments around the world on vaccines as public health tools and the active and vigorous discouragement of any debate of any safety concerns around vaccines though I would not expect to see the Council of Europe pass the motion and conduct any real investigations.  Nor do I expect the Council of Europe to find that the H1N1 Pandemic was overblown.  Of course I have been wrong before.  

As for whether it was reasonably forseeable that the  "pandemic" would not be as harsh as predicted by public health authorities there were credible skeptics who questioned the pandemic rhetoric many months ago.  As with any questioning of vaccine related issues skeptics and critics of public health authorities' "consensus" on these issues were largely ignored, ridiculed or demonized.  

As for whether "drug makers" or pharmaceuticals have too  much influence over public health authority decisions concerning pandemics and other public health issues I will leave that question to someone truly knowledgeable on the subject ... someone like Dr. Julie Gerberding who led the CDC from 2002 to 2009 and who will now lead Merck's vaccine division:

 "WASHINGTON, Dec 21 (Reuters) - Dr. Julie Gerberding, former director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was named president of Merck & Co Inc's (MRK.N) vaccine division, the company said on Monday.... She may be charged with reigniting flagging sales of Merck's Gardasil vaccine to prevent cervical cancer by protecting against human papillomavirus or HPV. After an encouraging launch Gardasil sales have been falling and were down 22 percent in the third quarter at $311 million." [Bold emphasis added - HLD]

One thing I would like to see emerge from the H1N1 Pandemic, whether the Pandemic label was justified or not, are studies of the impact on the health, including any negative health  effects, if any, of the many people vaccinated with H1N1 shots.  In some countries adjuvants and other ingredients, including thimerosal, were included in the H1N1 shots.  

One of the high priority  target groups to receive H1N1 shots was pregnant women. Some credible public health authorities, including Dr. Bernadine Healy, have pointed out that thimerosal,  a mercury based preservative, crosses the placenta.  It would seem appropriate to me to keep data on the health effects of the H1N1 vaccine on  these women and the children who received the H1N1 shots in utero. 

It seems to this humble layperson that the developmental histories of children born during this time period from pregnant women who (1) did not receive the H1N1 shot (2) received the H1N1 shot without thimerosal, (3) received the H1N1 shot without adjuvants should be compared.   As someone with an interest in autism disorders and what causes them I am interested in particular in seeing a comparison of  autism rates 2+ years from now of children whose mothers were carrying them when they  received H1N1 shots containing thimerosal  and children whose mothers, while carrying them, received H1NH1 vaccine shots without thimerosal.

No I am not expecting such studies to be done and yes I do expect to be ignored, ridiculed or demonized for making these suggestions.  But I am making them anyway.

autism