Saturday, July 09, 2011

Autism Genetic Myth DEBUNKED!



Our understanding of autism has been impaired for over a decade by the myth that autism is primarily genetic, a myth that has now been debunked as set out in the accompanying news release from the University of California. The WOO  peddled by the "it's gotta be genetic" autism crowd is now, finally, losing ground:



Study debunks autism as primarily genetic disorder

Date: 2011-07-05
Contact: Kristen Bole
Phone: (415) 502-6397
Email: kristen.bole@ucsf.edu
Neil Risch
Neil Risch 
SAN FRANCISCO — A rigorous study of nearly 400 twins has shown that environmental factors have been underestimated, and genetics overestimated, for their roles in autism spectrum disorders.

The study found that the children’s environment represents more than half of the susceptibility — 55 percent in the most severe form of autism and 58 percent in the broad spectrum of the disorder — while genetics is involved in 37 percent and 38 percent of the risk, respectively.

This is the largest and most rigorous twin study to date to research the genetic component of the disorder, and tapped expertise from the UCSF Institute for Human Genetics and Stanford University — which jointly led the research — as well as from Kaiser Permanente, UC Davis, the Autism Genetic Research Exchange and the California Department of Public Health.

“Autism had been thought to be the most heritable of all neurodevelopmental disorders, with a few small twin studies suggesting a 90 percent link,” said UCSF geneticist Neil Risch, director of the UCSF Institute for Human Genetics and senior author of the paper. “It turns out the genetic component still plays an important role, but in our study, it was overshadowed by the environmental factors shared by twins.”

Findings appear in the July 2011 issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry and can be found online at http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/.

“Our work suggests that the role of environmental factors has been underestimated,” said Dr. Joachim Hallmayer, first author of the paper and an associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
What exactly those environmental factors are, Hallmayer said, is the “multimillion dollar question,” but he noted that the disorder’s manifestation in very young children indicates a cause early in life and possibly during pregnancy.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a range of complex neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by social impairments, communication difficulties and restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior, according to the National Institute of Mental Health. An estimated six children out of every 1,000 — or one in 166 — have some form of autism, with boys four times more likely than girls to have it. That rate is roughly 10 times the prevalence of the disorder in the 1960s, which has spurred a concerted effort to identify the source of the condition.

The twin study compared those records with California birth certificates for children born between 1987 and 2004, and identified 2,312 twins in which at least one member was affected with some form of autism.  The children were all at least 4 years old, when autism can be reliably diagnosed. Risch and Hallmayer collaborated with autism expert Lisa Croen at Kaiser Permanente and epidemiologist Judith Grether at the California Department of Public Health, which tracks autism statewide through records from the Department of Developmental Services. Hallmayer then worked with UC Davis clinical psychologist Sally Ozonoff and the Southern California-based Autism Genetic Research Exchange to conduct parent interviews and full medical and behavioral evaluations of each child, to systematically assess whether the children had autism spectrum disorder, and if so, at what level of severity.

The initial results were staggering: A boy with a fraternal (not identical) twin with autism spectrum disorder had a 31 percent chance of also having the disorder, while a boy with an identical twin with the disorder had a 77 percent chance of sharing it. In girls, the concordance was 50 percent in identical twins and 36 percent for fraternal pairs. Ultimately, the group was winnowed to 192 pairs of twins, of which 54 were identical and 138 fraternal, for statistical analysis. Since autism disproportionately affects boys, only 80 of the pairs included both sexes.

Both rates are dramatically higher than the general population, in which the overall incidence of autism is about 0.6 percent. The high fraternal rate was especially unexpected, Risch said, because fraternal twins had previously been thought to have the same concordance as non-twin siblings. Identical twins share all of their genetic material, while fraternal twins share only half, the same as any siblings. The strong fraternal-twin rate in this study is considerably higher than non-twin siblings, indicating a strong environmental component unique to twins.

“The difference between the identical and fraternal rates shows that genetics definitely plays a role in the disorder,” Risch said, noting that if it didn’t, the concordance rates would be equal among the identical and fraternal groups. “But the fact that the fraternal twins have such a high rate shows that their shared environment is contributing significantly to their susceptibility.”

Croen, who is director of the Autism Research Program at Kaiser, said the findings suggest that events during pregnancy should be a focus for future research into the origins of autism.

The research was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, one of 27 institutes and centers of the National Institutes of Health, and by Autism Speaks.


Additional co-authors from Stanford include Jennifer Phillips, Dr. Linda Lotspeich, Sue Cleveland and Andrea Torres. Co-authors from Autism Genetic Resource Exchange include Brianne Cohen, Tiffany Torigoe, Angie Fedele, Janet Miller and Clara Lajonchere. Additional co-authors Jack Collins and Karen Smith are from the California Department of Public Health.

UCSF is a leading university dedicated to promoting health worldwide through advanced biomedical research, graduate-level education in the life sciences and health professions, and excellence in patient care. For more information, visit www.ucsf.edu.

4 comments:

usethebrainsgodgiveyou said...

There is a precedence in lead poisoning.

We have also determined rubella and valproic acid exposure during early pregnancy definitely affect the fetus's brain formation, and have unquestionably been implicated in autism.

I think because genetic study was so new, scientists were hopeful that the reason could be determined by genetic markers. We've tried, and although I am sure there is much more work to be done, we have failed. It is not a recognizable genetic anomoly.

Chemicals and viruses have already been implicated. We even have a time of exposure in the womb...the first trimester. Now is the time for the hard work.

There has been so much confusion, almost like a tennis match while many throw out ideas of possible etiologies.

We need to begin with what we know. Evironmental pre-natal exposure to certain teratogens DO cause brain damage in children.

astridvanwoerkom said...

Doesn't surprise me really. I've never really understood the single-cause mindset of some people, either genetics or environment. Remember, however, that a lot of these factors have existed for a long time, and therefore cannot explain the increase in autism diagnoses.

By the way, does anyone have any sources on valproic acid causing autism? My mother took that drug when pregnant with me.

usethebrainsgodgiveyou said...

astrid: I'm sorry, I had forgotten about this. I will look today. Are you able to get on pub-med?

Anonymous said...

Oh my! What will nimwits like Kristina Chew do now? She uses her blog as a platform for attempting to convince everyone that since she and her husband are strange then the autism in her son must be genetic and since this is so for them then it is a fact for every other autistic child in this world. You just can't change stupid.