Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Autism Community?‎ ASAN Is Anti Autism Cure and Nothing More

ASAN does NOT represent the autism "community".

At best it represents some persons with High Functioning Autism and Aspergers who view autism disorders not as medical disorders but as a social club for persons at the high functioning end of the spectrum and those people without autism spectrum disorders who, for whatever reason, like to self identify as autistic. It is not even clear if ASAN is referring to autism spectrum diagnoses when it refers to "autism" since it expressly rejects the "medical" model of autism in its by-laws:

" 1 MISSION STATEMENT

The Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN) seeks to improve the representation of the autistic community in public policy discussions and to advance the autistic culture movement. Based on neurodiversity and the social model of disability, ASAN seeks to promote social acceptance of neurological differences and to improve disability services and accommodations."

What the above statement indicates is that ASAN, presumably led by some persons with actual DSM diagnoses of Aspergers Disorder, and some higher functioning persons with PDD-NOS and Autistic Disorder, have started an organization which rejects the medical basis on which they have organized - their medical Autism Spectrum Diagnoses. Beyond that ASAN promotes the view that persons with autism are different but do not actually have a disorder. Accordingly no cure should be sought for persons with autism.

When Ari Ne'eman and company say WE don't want to be cured of our autism they are not talking about themselves as individuals or even about members of their organization. They object to parents seeking to treat and cure their own children and professionals who seek to help their efforts. While I acknowledge that it is Mr. Ne'eman's right to speak on behalf of himself in opposing treatment and cure for his àutism spectrum social condition, he and ASAN go further and oppose the right of parents to seek treatment for their own autistic children including those who are, unlike Mr. Ne'eman and the ASAN Board of Directors, severely autistic. They say so very expressly in the comment Autism Speaks in Columbus: Let Them Eat Cure by Meg Evans.

In the article above mentioned the author refers to several people who joined her at the ASAN protest of the Central Ohio/Ohio State University Autism Speaks walk which saw approximately 6,000 autistic persons, family members and friends turn walk to raise funds for autism research. The reality is that ASAN is a high profile extremist group which, thanks to the media talents of its very high functioning leadership, makes a big splash with autism ignorant organizations like the New Yorker and Canada`s CBC. It is too bad that these autism dilettante media organizations do not have their reporters get out of their comfortable chairs and go to events such as walks for autism research to see who actually speaks for autism ... it is the parents, family and friends of autistic children and severely autistic adults who are actually fighting to improve the lives of the truly autistic.




Bookmark and Share

5 comments:

farmwifetwo said...

They're also "anti-parent" and haven't clued in that that one's with the $$$ are those parents they like to trash in their blog posts.

Did you see in their "Ohio ASAN" post that 2 whole people stopped to talk to them... Out of 6,000. I haven't seen the video yet, but I have a feeling they were shunned instead of swarmed.

The simple reality is that where they posted about "Mary Antoinette and let them eat cake" in that post regarding AS, they do it for those with Autistic people.

Mary Antoinette "Let them eat cake".
ASAN "give them a few more supports".

Neither deals with the underlying issues, of true Autistic Disorder.

jonathan said...

some of us who are higher functioning (not severe by most standards) autistic wish to improve our lives also and wish for a cure.

Autism Reality NB said...

Thank you Jonathan.

I was aware of your position but did not want to presume to speak on your behalf. Thanks for adding your voice to the discussion.

Astrid said...

As I've posted in a comment to one of your other posts, I agree that ASAN has better things to do than organizing protests against stereotyped autism videos - online protest is enough to get the word out that at least there are other views than the one promoted by Autism Speaks, you and other bloggers. I think rather than wasting time on protests, they'd better take action that would actually improve the lives of autistic people in this world, ie. by helping to advance community services for autistic adults. It disappoints me that ASAN spends so little of its efforts on that.

However, as for your comment about the social vs. medical model of autism, these don't actually contradict each other. A medically, after all, has social consequences. To make a comparison, I am medically blind, but I reject the medical, cure-focused perspective on that in favor of a social perspective that emphasizes the accommodations to society that will make it easier for the blind to function. Same for autism.

Roger Kulp said...

Astrid,
I would be very interested in knowing how somebody arrived at such a seemingly contradictory position.I can only guess it is because you are relatively high functioning,and have never experienced any serious regressions or medical problems.

Functioning levels aside,ASAN and all of neurodiversity,bases its whole philosophy the "gotta be genetic" model of autism.Theresa Binstock criticizes.Something that is being disproven more and more every day.

Anyone who is interested,can watch Dr. Martha Herbert,an Assistant Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School,tear this idea to ribbons here:

http://www.autism.com/danwebcast/videoflv.asp?flv=at09-24-herbert1.flv&h=480&w=640&VID=118

As you watch in this,keep in mind all that you have read and heard from neurodiversity about autism being a 100% genetic condition that can't be changed.

And change is what neurodiversity is afraid of.Neurodiversity bloggers can put down supplements, and biomedical treatment,and spout all they want about lack of peer-review,but deep down,a lot of this is out of fear that it might work.I read a post at autisticliving.com from a young woman who was absolutely frantic about trying any biomedical treatment,because he was afraid it would make her into an entirely different person.This mindset is all too common.

I have been on an increasing regimen of supplements in the past year.High dose fish oil,CoQ10, folinic acid,and now MB12.And I know I am not done.My stimming is gone.I no longer elope.I have not had a head banging episode in four months.I have reason to believe these were due to undiagnosed seizures.I can talk a lot better. My memory has returned,and I'm just getting started.

No the more severe cases do not get "cured",especially if you are prone to regression.Curing autism is the wrong word to use,and the neurodiversity types are the only ones who still use it,albeit in a negative way.

The more realistic people see autism as a medical disease you treat and manage,like epilepsy. Even Susan Swedo,at NIH,who is trying to document biomedical improvements,doesn't use the word "cure".She talks of "remission",and like with cancer,the autism can return at any time.

ASAN and neurodiversity are a joke, in part because the research has pushed their message aside.Only a shrinking number of true believers who get too much media coverage, like Paul Offit,and Laurent Mottron take them seriously.