The decision has already been made by the American Psychiatric Association's DSM revision team to rename and revise the current Pervasive Development Disorders in the DSM-IV by combining them into one Autistic Disorder 299.0.
The DSM-5.org site presents a rationale for the changes including the observation that "A single spectrum disorder is a better reflection of the state of knowledge about pathology and clinical presentation; previously, the criteria were equivalent to trying to “cleave meatloaf at the joints”." I am not that big on meatloaf so they have lost me with that image.
The New Autism Spectrum Disorder (NASD) rationale also states that currently :
- ... distinctions among disorders have been found to be inconsistent over time, variable across sites and often associated with severity, language level or intelligence rather than features of the disorder.
- Because autism is defined by a common set of behaviors, it is best represented as a single diagnostic category that is adapted to the individual’s clinical presentation by inclusion of clinical specifiers (e.g., severity, verbal abilities and others) and associated features (e.g., known genetic disorders, epilepsy, intellectual disability and others.)
As the father of a boy with Autistic Disorder with profound developmental delays, a boy who in ordinary language would be described as severely autistic and affected in every single aspect of his existence by a low functioning level I understand the severity aspect of the rationale for the New Autism Spectrum Disorder. I tire of listening to the barely autistic engineers, lawyers, writers, university students, successful business persons, Washington political circle navigators and IMFAR socialites who are interviewed daily by the main stream media and tell the world what it means to "be autistic".
Despite my previously expressed concerns (1, 2) about the New Autism Spectrum Disorder I can see the logic in one"spectrum" disorder as long as the spectrum is clearly differentiated, as the DSM-5 site suggests, based on severity. Unfortunately the DSM-5 people have committed to the New Autism Spectrum Disorder without having clear criteria for differentiating severity categories and criteria in the NASD, or at least without having communicated severity criteria to the public including "autism parents" like this Dad.
I don't know much about cleaving meatloaf at the joints but it seems to me that with the New Autism Spectrum Disorder the DSM-5 team has put the cart before the horse by committing to the creation of a single autism spectrum disorder, the New Autism Spectrum Disorder, which recognizes distinctions based on severity, without first clearly defining severity categories or criteria.
Until comprehensible severity categories and criteria are developed this father of a boy diagnosed with the current Autistic Disorder and assessed with profound developmental delays says NEIGH to the New Autism Spectrum Disorder.
I don't know much about cleaving meatloaf at the joints but it seems to me that with the New Autism Spectrum Disorder the DSM-5 team has put the cart before the horse by committing to the creation of a single autism spectrum disorder, the New Autism Spectrum Disorder, which recognizes distinctions based on severity, without first clearly defining severity categories or criteria.
Until comprehensible severity categories and criteria are developed this father of a boy diagnosed with the current Autistic Disorder and assessed with profound developmental delays says NEIGH to the New Autism Spectrum Disorder.
2 comments:
I am annoyed at the fact that, many months after the decision was made to merge the autism spectrum, severity determiners are still not out. However, I can see the point, in that the autism spectrum is so diverse that it may be hard to differtiate clear autism severity subtypes. For example, if social responsiveness were used only (one proposal), intellectual disabiliity would be lost, and vice versa. And what abut non-core symptoms such as self-care difficulties, self-injury, sensory deficits, etc.? I don't see it as putting the cart before the horse if the autism spectrum is recognized as a single spectrum first, and then one tries to determine severity. However, it's sad that such research is still that limited, the autism spectrum disorders having all been in the DSM for over fifteen years and autistic disorde rhaving been in the DSM for 30.
Breakthrough research in the treatment of autism, cerebral palsy, and other developmental and neurological conditions at Center for Life Sciences, Health and Medicine, Pune - India.
Improvements have been seen in several thousand cases of Autism with Integrative Medicine Treatment G Therapy.
For videos and other scientific documentation kindly see www.g-therapy.org.
Youtube videos at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmWQm9AVf6A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isk0jkNSv0w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjjxhO_w8Ho
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fjjBPtCt70
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zwtb1OTwFZ8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXUCzmrcy-k
Scientists and researchers are invited.
Post a Comment